Meta-analysis reveals methane sink dynamics in upland soils, indicating significant climate impacts.
Well‐aerated upland soils serve as a crucial biological sink for atmospheric methane (CH 4 ), playing a key role in mitigating climate change. However, current understanding of how this CH 4 sink responds to global climate change remains limited. To address this, we integrated 1092 observational data points to construct a dataset covering multiple global change factors and used meta‐analysis to quantify the response mechanisms of the upland CH 4 sink. Results show that warming, reduced precipitation, and elevated carbon dioxide concentrations significantly strengthened the CH 4 sink, while increased precipitation and nitrogen addition weakened it. Interactive effects were also observed: low‐level nitrogen deposition acted antagonistically with increased precipitation, but synergistically with warming. We subsequently optimized a CH 4 oxidation model to explore the global distribution patterns and future trends under different climate scenarios. The current global upland soil CH 4 sink is estimated at approximately 37 Tg year −1 and generally shows an increasing temporal trend. Spatially, the sink exhibits heterogeneity: a greater extent of desert areas in the Northern Hemisphere leads to a lower CH 4 sink per unit area compared to the Southern Hemisphere. Future spatiotemporal trends of the soil CH 4 sink will depend on the climate pathway. Under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) 1–2.6 scenario, the CH 4 sink declines over time, whereas under SSP5‐8.5, it follows a unimodal trajectory. Variations in the soil CH 4 sink also differ across regions. These changes are primarily associated with atmospheric CH 4 concentrations under different climate pathways, as well as alterations in soil temperature and moisture resulting from various climate change drivers. These findings underscore the importance of the upland CH 4 sink in the global CH 4 cycle and significantly advance our understanding of its response mechanisms to climate change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: