PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Atmospheric measurement techniques3 citationsOpen Access

Correction of PM 2.5 underestimation in low-cost sensors under elevated dust loading using only sensor measurements

View Full Paper
KKKamaljeet KaurUniversity of UtahTMTristalee ManginUniversity of UtahKKKerry E. Kelly

Key Points

  • This research aims to improve the accuracy of PM2.5 readings from low-cost sensors under dust-dominated conditions.
  • Analyzed measurements from 109 PMS sensors near 75 U.S. EPA monitoring sites.
  • Developed thresholds based on humidity and the ratio of coarse to submicron particle mass concentration.
  • Used non-linear regression to create a correction factor for PM2.5 estimates.
  • Reduced mean bias error between PMS PM2.5 estimates and FEM PM2.5 by approximately 50% for 97 sensors.
  • Achieved a 30% reduction in root mean square error for 84 sensors.
  • Enhanced PMS5003/6003 measurement utility during elevated dust loading.

Abstract

Abstract. The Plantower PMS5003/6003 sensor is widely used for low-cost monitoring of particulate matter (PM), but it substantially underestimates PM2. 5 and PM10 during periods of elevated dust loading, when the particle size distribution is dominated by particles > 1 µm in diameter. This limitation is especially critical in the arid regions, such as the western United States, where windblown dust frequently degrades air quality, visibility, and public health. Accurate estimation of PM2. 5 and PM10 concentrations during periods dominated by dust typically relies on federal reference or equivalent methods (FRM/FEM), but these resources have limited spatial resolution. This study investigates whether PMS5003/6003 measurements alone can be used to detect and to bias correct for these dust-dominant PM conditions. We analyzed measurements from 109 PMS sensors collocated or near 75 U. S. EPA monitoring sites with hourly FEM PM2. 5 and/or PM10 between January 2017 to May 2025. Two cutoff thresholds (threshold1 and threshold2) were developed using relative humidity and the sensor-reported ratio of coarse (2. 5–10 µm) to submicron (0. 3–1 µm) mass concentration to identify potential periods dominated by dust when the PMS sensor underestimated PM2. 5 concentration. The thresholds can be used in real time, relying on the preceding 336 hourly measurements (consistent with PurpleAir's public archive display). To improve PM2. 5 estimates from the PMS sensor (pm2. 5ₐlt, a common correction for Plantower PMS measurements reported by PurpleAir), this study used pm2. 5ₐlt measurements identified as potential dust-dominated periods to develop a correction factor through non-linear regression. This correction reduced the mean bias error between PMS PM2. 5 estimates (pm2. 5ₐlt) and FEM PM2. 5 by approximately 50 % for 97 sensors, and reduced the root mean square error by approximately 30 % for 84 sensors. This framework enhances the utility of PMS5003/6003 measurements during periods of elevated dust loading, extending monitoring capabilities in regions where regulatory coverage is limited.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kaur et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a788ecb39a600b3ed50dhttps://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1077-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper