PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Transfusion1 citationsOpen Access

Early prediction of transfusion requirements in trauma patients using explainable machine learning

View Full Paper
MRMichael R. De La RosaThe University of Texas at San AntonioABAlexander BowersThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioBEBrian J. EastridgeThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a machine learning model to predict transfusion requirements in trauma patients swiftly.
  • Conducted a retrospective analysis using the TQIP dataset from 2019 to 2022.
  • Evaluated multiple machine learning models including logistic regression, XGBoost, and others.
  • Applied five-fold cross-validation for model tuning and assessed performance using AUROC.
  • 109,819 out of 1,232,956 patients received transfusions.
  • XGBoost achieved the highest AUROC score of 0.8452.
  • The model demonstrated an accuracy of 0.7298, with sensitivity at 0.7927 and specificity at 0.7236.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Hemorrhagic shock is the most common preventable cause of death in trauma patients. Early transfusion significantly improves survivability in patients suffering from hemorrhagic shock. We hypothesized that machine learning models could reduce time to initial transfusion by more rapidly identifying patients likely to require blood products. Study Design and Methods We conducted a retrospective model‐development and internal‐validation study using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) dataset from 2019 to 2022. Adult patients aged 18 years or older were included; the only exclusion criterion was missing transfusion outcome data. Models evaluated included logistic regression, ridge regression, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Random Forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) assessed using an 80/20 train–test split. Five‐fold cross‐validation was used for hyperparameter tuning. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used for model optimization. Results A total of 1,232,956 patients were included, of whom 109,819 (8.9%) received transfusions. XGBoost achieved the highest AUROC (0.8452). With a decision threshold of 0.0816 selected by maximizing balanced accuracy on the test set, accuracy was 0.7298, sensitivity was 0.7927, and specificity was 0.7236. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values showed that Injury Severity Score, systolic blood pressure, activation level, pulse rate, and age were the most influential predictors. Discussion XGBoost demonstrated strong predictive performance using only arrival‐time variables, and SHAP explanations offered clinically intuitive reasoning. These characteristics highlight the model's potential as a rapid decision‐support tool, although external validation remains an important next step.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rosa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a798ecb39a600b3ed691https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70106
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper