Key result
Pretransplant high CMV-IgG and detectable DNAemia linked to ~14-fold higher risk of clinically significant posttransplant CMV infections.
Why the study?
The impact of pretransplant CMV serology and DNAemia on posttransplant clinically-significant CMV infections in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients is poorly described.
Are pretransplant high CMV-IgG-titers and detectable CMV-DNAemia associated with higher incidence of posttransplant clinically-significant CMV infections in adult allo-HCTR?
Cohort (n=485)
No
Are pretransplant high CMV-IgG-titers and detectable CMV-DNAemia associated with higher incidence of posttransplant clinically-significant CMV infections in adult allo-HCTR?
Pretransplant high CMV-IgG-titers and detectable DNAemia are strong predictors of posttransplant clinically-significant CMV infections in allo-HCT recipients, suggesting a role for baseline CMV burden in risk stratification.
May aid pretransplant CMV risk stratification in allo-HCT; leaves open whether it should guide prophylaxis.
Background The impact of pretransplant CMV serology and DNAemia on posttransplant clinically-significant CMV infections (csCMVi) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients (allo-HCTR) is poorly described. Methods We performed a single-center cohort study of adult allo-HCTR (16.11.2015-31.12.2023). Letermovir prophylaxis was administered after 01.05.2019 during 100 days (d) posttransplant in CMV-seropositive patients (R+). We investigated associations of pretransplant CMV-IgG-titers and CMV-DNAemia with posttransplant csCMVi and CMV-DNAemia during 6 months posttransplant. In CMVR+, CMV-IgG-titers were classified as “low” (<40 IU/mL) or “high” (≥40 IU/mL). Quantitative CMV-PCR was performed pre-HCT, weekly for 3 months and as clinically-indicated. Results Among 485 patients included, 209 and 276 underwent a first allo-HCT in the pre- and post-letermovir periods, respectively; 314/485 (64.7%) patients were CMVR+. Patients with high CMV-IgG-titers had a higher incidence of csCMVi by d180 posttransplant (47.6%, 95%CI 41.4-53.6) than those with low CMV-IgG-titers (22.5%, 95%CI 11.5-35.7) and CMVR- (3.6%, 95%CI 1.5-7.2, p<0.001), and higher incidence of any CMV-DNAemia (p<0.001). Overall, 61/485 (12.6%) HCT were performed in patients with detectable/quantifiable pretransplant CMV-DNAemia, with higher posttransplant incidence of csCMVi by d180 (61.3%, 95%CI 47.6-72.4) compared to those with undetectable pretransplant CMV-DNAemia (26.9%, 95%CI 22.3-31.6, p<0.001) and higher incidence of any CMV-DNAemia (p<0.001). Pretransplant high CMV-IgG-titers (aHR: 14.18, p<0.001) and CMV-DNAemia (aHR: 2.43, p<0.001) were strong predictors of posttransplant csCMVi. Conclusion Pretransplant high CMV-IgG-titers and detectable DNAemia were associated with higher posttransplant csCMVi/CMV-DNAemia incidence, including in the letermovir era. Additional studies on the clinical utility of baseline pretransplant CMV burden in CMV prophylaxis stratification algorithms are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Royston et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients (n=485). Pretransplant high CMV-IgG-titers (≥40 IU/mL) and detectable CMV-DNAemia vs. Low CMV-IgG-titers (<40 IU/mL) and undetectable CMV-DNAemia was evaluated on Clinically-significant CMV infections (csCMVi) by day 180 posttransplant (aHR 14.18, p=<0.001). Pretransplant high CMV-IgG-titers and detectable CMV-DNAemia were strongly associated with higher incidence of posttransplant clinically-significant CMV infections (aHR 14.18 and 2.43, respectively; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: