Proposes a theoretical framework for defining global time through local reception sequences, indicating its significance in distributed systems.
This paper proposes an operational and ontological definition of global time as a canonical ordering constructed exclusively from locally registered reception sequences. It introduces a strict distinction between intrinsic source order, which is operationally inaccessible, and reception order, which is the only admissible basis for coordination at a destination. Using multiple scale-separated periodic sources (e.g., pulsars or satellite signals), the paper demonstrates that a bounded locality such as the Solar System can construct a robust, procedurally unique global temporal order without assuming any absolute time, spacetime geometry, or access to intrinsic emission histories. Global time is treated not as a physical quantity to be discovered, but as a normative canonical order sufficient for coordination, synchronization, and coherent observation. The framework is axiomatic and operator-based, providing explicit conditions for globality, robustness, and precision bounds. Practical instantiations are discussed through existing systems such as GPS, Pulsar Timing Arrays, and NTP, showing that canonical time is already a foundational construct in distributed technical infrastructures. The work is ontological in scope and does not propose a new physical theory of spacetime. Instead, it specifies the admissible status of temporal order required for coordination in distributed observational systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexey A. Nekludoff (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: