PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Annals of Surgery3 citationsOpen Access

The Role of Circulating Tumor DNA in Surgical Management of Pancreatic Cancer

View Full Paper
FBFilipe C. BorgesMPMafalda S. PintoMBMiguel F. Borges

Key Points

  • This review examines how circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can predict recurrence and survival in pancreatic cancer patients after surgery.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from Medline and Web of Science.
  • Analyzed primary outcomes of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
  • Included 18 studies with a total of 965 patients.
  • Presence of preoperative ctDNA linked to lower DFS and OS predictions.
  • Postoperative ctDNA positivity correlated strongly with decreased DFS and OS.
  • Significant association of ctDNA with worse OS in upfront resection and neoadjuvant treatment subgroups.

Abstract

Summary of Background Data: PDAC is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death in Europe. Surgery is the only possible cure; however, recurrence is common. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in pre- and post-surgery liquid biopsies as a prognostic biomarker for recurrence and survival in patients with PDAC. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies identified in Medline (via PubMed) and Web of Science. The primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: 18 studies (965 patients) were included in the analysis. The presence of preoperative ctDNA was significantly associated with lower DFS (HR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.63-2.65; P <0.00001) and OS (HR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.66-3.22; P <0.00001). Postoperative ctDNA positivity was correlated with lower DFS (HR: 3.29; 95% CI: 2.10-5.15; P <0.00001) and OS (HR: 3.42; 95% CI: 2.06-5.67; P <0.00001). In a subgroup analysis, ctDNA presence was also significantly associated with worse OS in both upfront resection (HR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.14-3.66; P =0.02) and neoadjuvant treatment (HR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.56-3.54; P <0.00001) subgroups. Conclusion: Both preoperative and postoperative ctDNA are significant negative prognostic markers in patients with PDAC undergoing surgery. In subgroup analysis, ctDNA maintained its prognostic value in both the upfront resection and neoadjuvant treatment groups. Monitoring ctDNA can help personalize treatment, specifically in the selection of patients for neoadjuvant, surgical, and adjuvant therapies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Borges et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a7a5ecb39a600b3ed7fdhttps://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000007036
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper