PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Quality of Life Outcomes After Endoscopic Cholesteatoma Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

View Full Paper
LGLuana-Maria GherasieCarol Davila University of Medicine and PharmacyVZV. ZaineaCarol Davila University of Medicine and PharmacyTETamer Bayoumi EbaiedSheikh Shakhbout Medical City

Key Points

  • Assess postoperative quality of life in patients undergoing endoscopic cholesteatoma surgery using validated measures.
  • Conducted a prospective observational cohort study with 41 patients.
  • Used Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 (COMQ-12) and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) for assessment.
  • Evaluated pre- and postoperative quality of life over a follow-up period of 12 months.
  • COMQ-12 scores improved significantly from baseline to 12 months (mean difference −43.8, p < 0.001).
  • GBI scores increased from 82.6 at 6 months to 84.1 at 12 months (p < 0.001).
  • Mean air-bone gap decreased significantly postoperatively from 52.1 dB to 26.4 dB (p < 0.001).

Abstract

Background: Cholesteatoma is a destructive middle ear lesion that compromises hearing and quality of life, for which endoscopic ear surgery (EES) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to microscopic approaches. While recurrence and audiological outcomes are frequently reported, patient-centered evaluations using validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) remain limited. Objective: This study aimed to assess postoperative quality of life in patients undergoing exclusive endoscopic cholesteatoma surgery, using validated patient-reported outcome measures. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study in a tertiary referral center, enrolling 41 patients who underwent exclusive endoscopic cholesteatoma surgery over 20 months. Pre- and postoperative QoL was assessed using the Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 (COMQ-12) and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI). Results: COMQ-12 scores improved significantly from baseline (54.0 ± 4.2) to 12 months (10.2 ± 3.3; mean difference −43.8, 95% CI: −46.1 to −41.5; p < 0.001). GBI scores were consistently high, increasing from 82.6 ± 4.8 at 6 months to 84.1 ± 4.9 at 12 months (p < 0.001). Audiometric evaluation demonstrated a significant postoperative improvement, with the mean air–bone gap (ABG) decreasing from 52.1 ± 5.3 dB preoperatively to 26.4 ± 4.7 dB postoperatively (p < 0.001), indicating substantial closure of the conductive gap. Conclusions: Exclusive endoscopic cholesteatoma surgery yields robust QoL improvement, favourable hearing outcome, and recurrence rates similar to classic techniques at short-term evaluation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gherasie et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a7b5ecb39a600b3edb43https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15041556
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Endoscopic stapedotomy: safety and audiological results in 150 patients2019 · 42 citations
  2. 2A Clinical Comparative Study of Schnider and Eleveld Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models for Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion Sedation in Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy2025 · 4 citations
  3. 3Management of acquired cholesteatoma in the pediatric population2013 · 55 citations
  4. 4Inferior retrotympanum revisited: An endoscopic anatomic study2010 · 104 citations
  5. 5Diffusion weighted imaging for the detection and evaluation of cholesteatoma2017 · 74 citations