Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This evaluation examines outcomes of HoLEP for chronic urinary retention in men, indicating its effectiveness and safety.
Objectives Chronic painless urine retention (CUR) with > 1 liter of postvoid residual urine (PVR) is a rare but serious complication of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of HoLEP in men with chronic painless urinary retention and PVR volumes exceeding 1 l. Methods We retrospectively reviewed data from men who underwent “en‐bloc” HoLEP between July 2017 and May 2024. We identified patients with CUR and PVR > 1 l due to BPO (study group). Excluded were those with acute‐on‐chronic retention, bladder diverticulum or neurogenic bladder. A matched‐pair analysis (1:2) was performed with patients having PVR < 50 ml (control group). We compared demographic, perioperative, and postoperative voiding parameters and complications up to 1 year. Results Of 660 patients, 20 had baseline PVR > 1 l. Demographic and preoperative parameters were similar, except for a higher catheterization rate in the study group (50% vs. 17.5%, p < 0.005). The study group had a higher risk of failing a voiding trial on the first postoperative day (20% vs 5.2%) though the difference was not statistically significant. By 1‐month post‐HoLEP, all patients in the study group were catheter‐free and voiding spontaneously. No significant differences were found in postoperative voiding improvements and complications between the groups. Neither group required medical or surgical retreatment within 1 year. Conclusions HoLEP is effective and safe for patients with CUR and PVR > 1 l due to BPO, although these patients have a higher risk of failing a voiding trial on the first postoperative day.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rathinam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: