Life cycle assessment quantifies carbon emissions in Fuding white tea production, suggesting strategies for reduction.
Background: White tea, despite being one of the six major types of Chinese tea, has received relatively little attention regarding its production-related environmental impacts. This study employed a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the carbon footprint of Fuding white tea production. Results: An integrated cradle-to-grave assessment, informed by field surveys, literature, and background databases (including complete life-cycle data from 15 tea enterprises), revealed an average carbon emission intensity of 16.94 ± 3.41 kg CO2 eq per kilogram of finished tea (crude). Major emission sources included electricity consumption (45–68% of total emissions), water usage (15–26%), and fertilizer application (7–22%), with major hotspots identified in the processing stage (4.10–12.73 kg CO2 eq/kg, primarily from energy-intensive drying and refining) and consumption stage (5.17–5.67 kg CO2 eq/kg, dominated by water heating). Analysis of 216 scenarios revealed production emissions ranged from 15.44 to 22.72 kg CO2 eq/kg. Notably, emissions could be reduced by up to 56% through integrated measures such as organic fertilization, natural withering, and short-chain distribution. When accounting for tea garden carbon sequestration (1.17–8.45 kg CO2 eq/kg), the production of Fuding white tea could potentially achieve net-negative emissions. Conclusions: To support decarbonization, we propose a tripartite strategy: adoption of green electricity and organic fertilizers during production, promotion of short-chain distribution systems and low-carbon consumer practices, and innovating carbon sink trading mechanisms. These findings offer a scientific foundation for reducing the carbon footprint per unit of tea and enhancing the green competitiveness of the tea industry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: