PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Implementation Science0 citationsOpen Access

Implementing an intervention to facilitate early detection of deterioration in aged care residents: process evaluation of the EDDIE + trial

EBElla L. BracciFlinders UniversityMAMichelle AllenQueensland University of TechnologyHCHannah E. Carter

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the implementation and impact of the EDDIE+ intervention on staff's ability to detect resident deterioration.
  • Conducted a mixed methods process evaluation using the i-PARIHS framework.
  • Assessed fidelity, acceptability, and barriers to implementation in residential aged care homes.
  • Collected qualitative data through semi-structured interviews and self-efficacy surveys.
  • Analyzed quantitative data using linear mixed modeling.
  • Fidelity of the intervention was inconsistent due to workforce challenges and contextual factors.
  • No significant differences in staff self-efficacy were found pre- and post-intervention.
  • Qualitative analysis showed staff felt more knowledgeable and confident in their skills.
  • High acceptability for the EDDIE+ intervention was reported despite mixed implementation outcomes.

Abstract

Abstract Background EDDIE + was a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial with an embedded process evaluation in 11 residential aged care (RAC) homes in Queensland, Australia. The intervention aimed to upskill RAC staff to identify and manage deterioration to reduce unnecessary hospital transfer through education, decision support tools, diagnostic equipment and local facilitation. Main trial results indicated 46% of hospital admissions were due to falls and no significant improvements to outcome measures including hospital bed days were achieved. These findings were examined through a process evaluation. Methods A mixed methods approach guided by the i-PARIHS framework was used to assess fidelity, acceptability, mechanisms of impact and feasibility of implementation, including barriers and enablers. Semi-structured interviews, self-efficacy surveys, and project tracking documents were used. Qualitative data were coded to the i-PARIHS framework and quantitative data were analysed using linear mixed modelling. Results Fidelity varied considerably due to workforce shortages including vacancy in the local clinical facilitator role, high workload, COVID-19, and other contextual factors. Differences in job and team-related staff self-efficacy before and after the introduction of EDDIE + were not statistically significant. However, inductive thematic analysis of the questionnaires indicated that staff felt their knowledge, skills, confidence and communication had increased. Conclusions The process evaluation indicates high acceptability of the EDDIE + intervention. However, fidelity and intended mechanisms of impact were mixed despite substantial pre-planning prior to implementation. For future studies, specific barriers in the RAC setting such as staffing and turnover may be unable to be adequately addressed without systemic change. Trial registration The trial is prospectively registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12620000507987, registered 23/04/2020).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bracci et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a7e3ecb39a600b3edfb9https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-026-01484-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper