What question did this study set out to answer?

February 19, 2026Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology0 citations

Effectiveness of minimal stimulation versus conventional GnRH antagonist protocols in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a retrospective analysis of 10769 IVF/ICSI cycles

SSShashank SanagoudarInstitute of Reproductive Medicine VCVipin ChandraPatna Medical College and Hospital KMKshitiz MurdiaInstitute of Reproductive Medicine

Key Points

The study aims to compare the effectiveness of minimal stimulation versus conventional GnRH antagonist protocols in IVF/ICSI cycles.
Retrospective analysis of 10769 IVF/ICSI cycles
Comparison between minimal stimulation and conventional treatment groups
Assessment of live birth rates
The minimal stimulation group had a higher live birth rate compared to the conventional group
Indicates potential benefits for certain patient populations with fewer drugs used

Abstract

Compared to the standard treatment, the minimal stimulation group's live birth rate was much higher, indicating that some patient populations might benefit from fewer drugs and less stimulation.

Demander à l'IA

Bookmark

View Full Paper