Key result
Telephone-based dyadic problem-solving improves self-care, problem-solving, and depressive symptoms in HF patients.
Why the study?
Rural heart failure dyads face unique challenges to optimal self-care and higher emotional burden, and tailored dyadic problem-solving interventions supporting teamwork may enhance self-care and reduce depressive symptoms.
Does a telephone-based dyadic problem-solving intervention improve problem-solving, HF self-care, and depressive symptoms in rural heart failure dyads?
Does a telephone-based dyadic problem-solving intervention improve problem-solving, HF self-care, and depressive symptoms in rural heart failure dyads?
A telephone-based dyadic problem-solving intervention significantly improves self-care, problem-solving, and depressive symptoms in rural heart failure patients and their care partners.
May support rural HF dyads but should not yet change practice; hypothesis-generating for randomized efficacy trials.
Background: Managing heart failure (HF) is stressful for rural dyads who experience unique challenges to optimal HF self-care and a higher emotional burden. Tailored, dyadic problem-solving interventions that support teamwork in managing HF problems may enhance dyadic HF self-care and reduce depressive symptoms. Objective: To examine the feasibility and preliminary effects of a telephone-based, tailored, dyadic problem-solving intervention on problem-solving, patient and care partner contributions to HF self-care, and depressive symptoms. Methods: Using a dyadic single-group repeated-measures design, 41 rural HF dyads participated in 8 telephone sessions to address dyadic HF-related problems. Data on problem-solving, HF self-care, and depressive symptoms were collected at baseline and at 5, 9, and 13 weeks. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze demographics and outcome variables. Changes in patient and care partner outcomes were analyzed using dyadic growth curve modeling. Results: Patients were on average 66.54 years old, mostly White (69.2%), married (66.7%), and female (59%). Care partners were on average 60.83 years old, mostly White (70.7%), married (75.6%), females (58.5%), and spouses (68.3%). Patient scores significantly improved for problem-solving ( b = 0.45, P <.001), self-care maintenance ( b = 2.29, P <.001), and depressive symptoms ( b = −1.81, P =.002). Self-care confidence significantly increased in both patients ( b = 2.51, P <.001) and care partners ( b = 2.26, P =.01). Conclusions: Dyadic problem-solving interventions seem to be beneficial in improving problem-solving, HF self-care, and depressive symptoms, especially in rural patients. More research is needed to examine this intervention in a larger clinical trial. Clinical Trials Registration: This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (#00001621).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graven et al. (2026) studied this question. Telephone-based dyadic problem-solving improved HF patients' problem-solving (b=0.45), self-care maintenance (b=2.29), depressive symptoms (b=-1.81), and self-care confidence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing