PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Journal of Neuroscience2 citations

A shared theta-rhythmic process for selective sampling of environmental information and internally stored information

View Full Paper
PCPaul J. CavanahIFIan C. Fiebelkorn

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how selective attention processes for external and internal information share neural resources and mechanisms.
  • Utilized EEG to measure brain activity during tasks requiring external and internal information sampling.
  • Employed a dual-task design to compare performance between external and internal information.
  • Analyzed phase-dependent changes in behavioral performance and sensory responses, specifically the N1 and CPP components.
  • Evidence of shared theta-rhythmic processes impacting both external and internal information sampling.
  • The 'bad' theta phase correlated with slower perceptual decision-making during dual-task trials.
  • Phase-dependent changes in sensory responses indicated interactions between external and internal information.

Abstract

Selective attention is the collection of mechanisms through which the brain preferentially processes behaviorally important information. Many everyday tasks, such as shopping for groceries, require selective sampling (i.e., attention-related sampling) of both external information (i.e., information from the environment) and internally stored information (i.e., information being maintained in working memory). While there is clear evidence that selective sampling of external information is influenced by internally stored information (and vice versa), the extent to which selective sampling of external and internal information compete for the same neural resources and attention-related processes remains a focus of debate. Previous research has linked theta-rhythmic (3–8 Hz) neural activity in higher-order (e.g., frontal cortices) and sensory regions to theta-rhythmic changes in behavioral performance during selective sampling. Here, we used EEG and a dual-task design (i.e., a task that required both external and internal information), in male and female humans, to directly compare theta-dependent fluctuations in behavioral performance during external sampling with those during internal sampling. Our findings are consistent with a shared theta-rhythmic process for selectively sampling external information or internal information. This theta-rhythmic sampling is associated with both phase-dependent changes in sensory responses (i.e., as measured with the N1 component) and phase-dependent changes in interactions between external and internal information. The theta phase associated with weaker sensory responses and relatively worse behavioral performance (i.e., the ‘bad’ phase) is also associated with a slowed perceptual decision-making process (as measured with the CPP component), specifically during dual-task trials when to-be-detected external information matches to-be-remembered internal information. Significance statement Most everyday tasks require information from both the external environment and internal memory stores; however, the extent to which selective processing of external and internal information rely on shared neural mechanisms and resources remains a subject of debate. Recent work has demonstrated attention-related, theta-rhythmic fluctuations (3–8 Hz) in neural activity and behavioral performance, perhaps reflecting the temporal coordination of competing functions (e.g., attention-related sampling and shifting). Here, we used EEG and a dual-task design to provide evidence of a shared, theta-rhythmic process for alternately boosting the sampling of either external or internal information. This shared, theta-rhythmic process also modulates interactions between external and internal information on dual-task trials, when these sources of information compete for limited processing resources.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cavanah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a869ecb39a600b3ef2a7https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1560-25.2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Electroencephalogram Decoding Reveals Distinct Processes for Directing Spatial Attention and Encoding Into Working Memory2024 · 21 citations
  2. 2Rhythmic temporal coordination of neural activity prevents representational conflict during working memory2023 · 28 citations
  3. 3Working Memory1992 · 5,238 citations
  4. 4The blinking spotlight of attention2007 · 290 citations
  5. 5Phase-dependent neuronal coding of objects in short-term memory2009 · 624 citations