PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Clinical Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract GS3-05: Evaluation of the Sensitivity to Endocrine Therapy (SETER/PR) assay to predict benefit from extended endocrine therapy in the NRG/NSABP B-42 trial

View Full Paper
EME. P. MamounasHBHanna BandosKSK. J. Sweeney

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine if the SETER/PR assay can predict benefits from extended letrozole therapy in breast cancer patients.
  • Evaluated the SETER/PR index using a hybridization assay in HER2- breast cancer samples.
  • Defined cut points for analysis based on the inter-quartile range and established reference cohorts.
  • Used Cox proportional hazards models to assess the relationship between SETER/PR index and breast cancer-free interval.
  • ELT reduced the 10-year rate of BCFI events by 4.2% in the cohort studied (HR 0.69, p=0.016).
  • Patients with a SETER/PR index ≥1.50 had a significant 10-year BCFI benefit of 7.1% from ELT (HR 0.53, p=0.014).
  • No significant treatment effect difference was observed in patients with SETER/PR index <1.50 (HR 0.82, p=0.31).

Abstract

Abstract Background: SETER/PR index of sensitivity to endocrine therapy (ET) measures endocrine receptor-related transcription from fixed paraffin-embedded tissue and is highly reproducible within and between laboratories. SETER/PR index is correlated with receptor ligand binding activity and predicts early pharmacodynamic response to ET and survival outcomes following ET in palliative and adjuvant treatment settings. We evaluated whether SETER/PR index predicts benefit from extended letrozole therapy (ELT) in the NSABP B-42 trial, which evaluated ELT vs placebo in HR+ postmenopausal breast cancer patients (pts) who had received 5 yrs of adjuvant ET with aromatase inhibitor (AI), or tamoxifen followed by AI. Methods: SETER/PR index was measured using the QuantiGene Plex bead-based hybridization assay (ThermoFisher) using two unstained sections and an H0.05. Results: Breast cancer blocks with tumor tissue were available from 1,556 eligible, HER2- pts, with 1,489 (96%) producing SETER/PR results that passed quality control and were included in the study cohort. There were no statistically significant differences in pt or tumor characteristics between the study cohort and the rest of the HER2 negative B-42 pts. ELT reduced the 10-yr rate of BCFI events by 4.2% in the study cohort (HR 0.69, 95%CI 0.51-0.94, p=0.016). Among 1,489 pts, 59% had SETER/PR index in the range 1.10-2.10 with 42% measuring ≥1.50. No difference in the ELT effect was observed between groups of pts identified by the primary inter-quartile range cut point (1.10 ≤SETER/PR index ≤2.10 vs other). Benefit from ELT was statistically significant in pts with SETER/PR index ≥1.50 (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.32-0.88, p=0.014), but not in those with SETER/PR index 1.50 (HR 0.82, 95%CI 0.56-1.20, p=0.31), without significant treatment-by- SETER/PR index interaction (p=.14). Overall, the 10-yr absolute BCFI benefit from ELT was 7.1% in pts with SETER/PR index ≥1.50 (Placebo: 14.9%, Letrozole: 7.8%) and 2.1% in those with SETER/PR index 1.50 (Placebo: 14.5%, Letrozole 12.4%). When evaluated by nodal status, node-positive pts with SETER/PR index ≥1.50, had a 10.5% absolute reduction in the 10-yr BCFI events (Placebo:19.2%, Letrozole: 8.7%; HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.26-1.06), whereas those with SETER/PR index 1.50, had a 3% absolute reduction in the 10-yr BCFI events (Placebo:20.1%, Letrozole: 17.1%; HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.50-1.40). Node-negative pts with SETER/PR index ≥1.50 had a 5.2% absolute reduction in the 10-yr BCFI events (Placebo: 12.4%, Letrozole: 7.2%; HR 0.55, 95%CI 0.27-1.11), whereas those with SETER/PR index 1.50, had a 1.9% absolute reduction in the 10-yr BCFI events (Placebo:10.8%, Letrozole: 8.9%; HR 0.80, 95%CI 0.44-1.43). When evaluating the performance of SETER/PR index as a continuous measure, increasing values of SETER/PR index were associated with greater relative benefit from ELT (treatment-by- SETER/PR index per unit increase interaction HR 0.71, 95%CI 0.43-1.18). Conclusions: Benefit from ELT was enriched in the subset of pts with SETER/PR index ≥1.50. This supports the hypothesis that longer duration of endocrine therapy is more effective for pts with highly endocrine-sensitive cancers. NCT00382070 NCI UH3CA276603; U10 CA180868, -180822, UG1CA189867; U24CA196067; Korea Health Technology R 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-05.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mamounas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a879ecb39a600b3ef35ahttps://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-gs3-05
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper