PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Cancers1 citationsOpen Access

Symptom Monitoring in Ovarian Cancer Patients Treated with PARP Inhibitors: Agreement Between Physician- and Patient-Reported Toxicities Using PRO-CTCAE

View Full Paper
RMRoberta MassobrioDADaniela AttianeseATAlessandra Testi

Key Points

  • This study evaluates the agreement between physician and patient reports of toxicities related to PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer patients.
  • Included ovarian cancer patients treated with PARP inhibitors after chemotherapy.
  • Administered the Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) questionnaire.
  • Assessed agreement using Cohen’s kappa and Gwet’s AC1 metrics for reported toxicities.
  • Observed poor agreement between physician and patient reports for described toxicities, with Cohen’s kappa values ranging from 0 to 0.15.
  • Notably low agreement for decreased appetite, rash, headache, arthralgia, insomnia, and fatigue.
  • Physicians under-reported symptoms, with rates up to 70.2% for arthralgia and 57.1% for rash.

Abstract

Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) treatment in ovarian cancer patients after first-line chemotherapy and following the response to platinum-based chemotherapy at relapse is associated with survival benefits. Maintenance therapies can be administered over extended periods, making treatment tolerability assessment essential in optimizing patient outcomes. This cohort study aimed to evaluate the agreement between physician and patient reporting of PARP inhibitor-related toxicities and the rate of underestimation of each symptom considered. Methods: Patients treated with PARPis in the first-line or recurrent setting were included. A specific Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) questionnaire was generated and administered to the cohort. For each toxicity, agreement between patients and physicians was assessed using Cohen’s kappa and Gwet’s AC1; in addition, the rate of toxicity under-reporting by physicians was calculated. Results: Seventy-seven ovarian cancer patients were included; 39 (50.6%) received PARPis in the first-line setting, while 38 (49.4%) were treated for recurrence. Cohen’s kappa values for agreement between patients and physicians across 12 reported toxicities ranged from 0 to 0.15, indicating poor agreement (κ < 0.20) for all assessed toxicities, with the lowest levels of agreement for decreased appetite (κ = 0), rash (κ = 0.02), headache (κ = 0.00), arthralgia (κ = 0.03), insomnia (κ = 0.03), and fatigue (κ = 0.04). When agreement was assessed using Gwet’s AC1, agreement remained poor to moderate for the majority of the symptoms evaluated. Physician under-reporting rates were higher for nausea (51.9%), rash (57.1%), headache (49.3%), arthralgia (70.2%), insomnia (48.1%), and fatigue (67.5%). Conclusions: Our results underscore the importance of systematically integrating patient-reported outcomes into clinical practice, including in maintenance settings, to ensure an accurate assessment of treatment-related toxicities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Massobrio et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a879ecb39a600b3ef433https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18040650
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Measuring Quality of Life in Routine Oncology Practice Improves Communication and Patient Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial2004 · 1,417 citations
  2. 2The EORTC Core Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ-C30): validity and reliability when analysed with patients treated with palliative radiotherapy1995 · 444 citations
  3. 3An international field study of the reliability and validity of a disease-specific questionnaire module (the QLQ-OV28) in assessing the quality of life of patients with ovarian cancer2003 · 230 citations
  4. 4Computing inter‐rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement2006 · 2,067 citations
  5. 5Development of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)2014 · 1,166 citations