PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics0 citationsOpen Access

Charge-sign dependent drift effects in the time-lag of cosmic-ray variation relative to solar activity observed with CALET

View Full Paper
OAO AdrianiYAY AkaikeKAK. Asano

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand the variations in cosmic-ray flux time-lags relative to solar activity across different solar cycles.
  • Analyzed cosmic-ray flux data from CALET during odd and even solar cycles.
  • Compared neutron monitor data across various solar cycle epochs.
  • Evaluated time-lag effects based on charge-sign of cosmic rays.
  • Found a longer time-lag in odd solar cycles and a shorter time-lag in even solar cycles.
  • Observed consistent time-lag for proton and electron flux in A > 0 epochs.
  • Demonstrated charge-sign dependent time-lag variations, highlighting differences in drift effects.

Abstract

Abstract The 11-yr variation of galactic cosmic-ray flux lags behind the variation of the sunspot number. An average ~1-yr time-lag is expected from the outward propagating solar wind with the frozen-in photospheric magnetic field varying in the solar cycle, and from the inward diffusive transport of cosmic-ray particles. The long-term neutron monitor data, however, show that the time-lag is significantly longer (shorter) in the odd (even) solar cycle. In this paper, we analyze the time-lag in proton and electron fluxes observed by the CALET. It is found that the time-lag is similar in proton and electron fluxes during an A 0 polarity epoch of the solar dipole magnetic field. In an even solar cycle 24 including a polarity reversal from A 0 to A 0, on the other hand, it is found that the time-lag of proton (electron) flux variation is significantly shorter (longer) than the average ~1-yr lag by analyzing the combined data with CALET and AMS-02. This is the first observation of the charge-sign dependent time-lag. We demonstrate that these observations can be qualitatively interpreted in terms of different 11-yr time profiles of proton and electron fluxes in A 0 and A 0 epochs expected from the drift effect.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adriani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a887ecb39a600b3ef4c6https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptag025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper