Key result
GDF-15 and suPAR biomarkers improve short-term risk stratification after transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention.
Why the study?
Optimal patient selection for transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions is challenging and conventional biomarkers may inadequately reflect clinical risk in this population.
Do pre-procedural measurements of emerging biomarkers (GDF-15, suPAR, H-FABP, sST2) predict short-term all-cause mortality or heart-failure rehospitalization in patients undergoing transcatheter treatment for severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Cohort (n=60)
No
Do pre-procedural measurements of emerging biomarkers (GDF-15, suPAR, H-FABP, sST2) predict short-term all-cause mortality or heart-failure rehospitalization in patients undergoing transcatheter treatment for severe tricuspid regurgitation?
GDF-15 and suPAR offer strong prognostic value for predicting short-term mortality and heart failure rehospitalization following transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention, outperforming conventional biomarkers like NT-proBNP.
May aid short-term risk stratification after TTVI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Background Interventional therapies for tricuspid regurgitation are rapidly evolving, yet optimal patient selection remains challenging. Conventional biomarkers such as NT-proBNP may inadequately reflect the complex pathophysiology and clinical risk in this population. Emerging biomarkers—including soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP), and growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15)—remain insufficiently studied in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions.Methods This prospective, single-center observational cohort study enrolled consecutive patients undergoing transcatheter treatment for severe tricuspid regurgitation, including transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and heterotopic caval valve implantation. Pre-procedural blood samples were collected and analyzed for GDF-15, suPAR, H-FABP, and sST2 using standardized assays. Prognostic performance for the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or heart-failure rehospitalization within three months was assessed using receiver-operating-characteristic analysis and multivariable Cox regression.Results Sixty patients (mean age 80.3 ± 7.3 years; 48.3% male) were included. At three months, 12 patients (20%) were rehospitalized and 6 (10%) had died. GDF-15 (AUC 0.867) and suPAR (AUC 0.885) demonstrated strong predictive accuracy and outperformed NT-proBNP. GDF-15 >1,400 pg/mL independently predicted adverse outcomes (HR 2.03, p = 0.046).Conclusion GDF-15 and suPAR provide incremental prognostic value for short-term risk stratification after transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edlinger et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Severe tricuspid regurgitation (n=60). Elevated GDF-15 (>1,400 pg/mL) vs. GDF-15 ≤1,400 pg/mL was evaluated on Composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or heart-failure rehospitalization within three months (HR 2.03, p=0.046).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: