This release implements an audited computation interface and a sealed strict simulation packet, indicating a significant advancement in reproducibility.
# OverviewThis record releases the **Yang–Mills Mass Gap Program v10.10** (PDF + TeX) together with a**sealed strict_simulation witness packet** implementing an *audited certificate interface*. Included artifacts:- Main paper: `YM_MG_v10.10.pdf`- Sealed witness packet (ZIP): `YM_MG_pkt_v10.10_strict_simulation_sealed.zip`- Hash / change summary: `YM_MG_pkt_v10.10_strict_simulation_sealed_diff_summary.txt` # Closed results (strict_simulation witness)The sealed packet ships a strict-simulation anchor report:- `results/e5_min_report.json` with - `mode = simulation` - `interface_id = "E5-min/v1.4"` - `coverage_slack = 0`- Mechanical audit is fail-closed and passes: - `python3 -B scripts/audit_all.py --packet_root . --report results/e5_min_report.json --profile strict_simulation` returns `PASS` (`results/audit_report.json: ok=true`).- Mandatory verifiers are included and pass: - Verifier2 (independent checker): `results/verifier2_report.json` - Verifier3 (rational): `results/verifier3_rational_report.json` - Verifier4 (interval/decimal): `results/verifier4_interval_report.json`- Instantiation bridge artifacts are bound and audited: - `results/pb_path_certificate.json` - `results/pb_instantiation_report.json`- Packet-wide digests are sealed: - `manifest.json` and `manifest_core.json` (SHA256-bound file list) # What's new in this v10.10 re-upload (sealed witness add-on)- A concrete **strict_simulation sealed witness ZIP** is now shipped as part of the record.- The anchor report was rebuilt to satisfy the `E5-min/v1.4` interface and strict binding rules (raw samples/summary replay, domain binding, configs-dir manifest, pb-instantiation digest alignment).- Verifier2 was updated to accept both `e5-min-report/v1.3` and `v1.4`, matching the v1.4 interval-upgrade step. # Reproducibility (quick start)Unzip the sealed packet and run:1) `bash scripts/final_seal.sh strict_simulation`2) `python3 -B scripts/audit_all.py --packet_root . --report results/e5_min_report.json --profile strict_simulation` Any missing file, schema mismatch, digest mismatch, or verifier failure yields `FAIL`. # Artifact fingerprints- `YM_MG_pkt_v10.10_strict_simulation_sealed.zip` - SHA256: 1340dd05af280b7d2c8ff8b60193a1b10895a6d624d6ea17b04bfe749fc1f1ae - bytes: 3046352- `YM_MG_pkt_v10.10_strict_simulation_sealed_diff_summary.txt` - SHA256: 5da9b30e62c603b3eba9c2f14b1d913fedd51b8a9887f0a043ddc9a099ac9973 # Scope & non-toy statusThis release provides an **audited proof interface** and a **sealed strict_simulation witness**.The strict_simulation profile is an internal simulation anchor (not an external observational dataset).A separate profile (`physics_strict`) is designed to bind external references/datasets with `status=REAL`via `results/external_source_note.json` and hash-checked file inclusion. # KeywordsYang–Mills, mass gap, SU(2), lattice gauge theory, Wilson action, Osterwalder–Schrader, certificate,audited computation, reproducibility, interval arithmetic, rational verification, manifest SHA256
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Byoungwoo Lee (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: