PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®0 citationsOpen Access

Feasibility of Intranasal Versus Subcutaneous Drug Administration: A Non-Randomised Crossover Study

View Full Paper
HHHanna HirschingerCRConstanze RémiETEric Thanbichler

Key Points

  • The study aims to compare the feasibility of intranasal and subcutaneous drug administration by non-professionals in a palliative care setting.
  • Conducted a non-randomised crossover study with 31 medical laypersons.
  • Participants administered both drug types in a simulated environment using placebo medication.
  • Measured primary endpoints of administration time and secondary endpoints of perceived ease and comfort.
  • Collected data using structured questionnaires and analyzed with paired t-tests.
  • Mean administration time was significantly shorter for intranasal (1:16) compared to subcutaneous (4:49).
  • >90% of participants preferred intranasal, citing ease and comfort.
  • Subcutaneous was rated more complex and cumbersome by nearly all participants.
  • Handling errors were more frequent with subcutaneous administration.

Abstract

Background In palliative care, drug delivery methods must be simple, rapid and acceptable especially in homecare settings to relatives as non-professional caregivers. This study compared intranasal (IN) and subcutaneous (SC) administration performed by medical laypersons under standardized conditions. Methods 31 volunteers without medical training participated in a non-randomised crossover study. After receiving instructions, participants performed both SC and IN administration in a simulated environment using placebo medication. Primary endpoints were preparation and administration time. Secondary endpoints included perceived ease, comfort, safety and handling difficulties. Data were collected using structured questionnaires. Statistical analyses used paired t-tests and binomial testing. Results All participants (27 female, median age range 50-60 years) completed both procedures. Mean administration time: 4:49 minutes (SD 1:20) for SC, 1:16 minutes (SD 0:20) for IN ( p 90% preferred IN and rated it as easier (30/31, 97%), more comfortable (30/31, 97%), faster (30/31, 97%) and safer (21/31, 68%). SC was consistently rated more complex (30/31, 97%) and cumbersome (30/31, 97%). Handling errors were more frequent with SC application. Nearly half of participants (15/31) had prior SC experience, while all had personal experience with nasal sprays, though not in administering them to another adult. Participants emphasized the importance of training for safe and accurate administration. Conclusion Medical laypersons strongly preferred IN over SC administration. IN was significantly faster, more acceptable and associated with fewer handling problems. These findings support IN administration as a practical and caregiver-friendly alternative in palliative care. Clinical Trial Number Not applicable. Trial Identification 173-02, protocol Version 02, 03.11.2022.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hirschinger et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a8c7ecb39a600b3efd32https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091261427444
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper