To address the small ATC-63 record set for collapse-oriented motion selection and the limited interpretability of data-driven approaches, this study proposes a framework for identifying structural-collapse-critical ground motions. Using 5074 records from the PEER NGA-West2 database, we applied STA/LTA event detection and extracted multi-source features. A Gaussian mixture model (GMM) was then used to perform unsupervised clustering and identify four physically interpretable groups. LightGBM, XGBoost, and Random Forest were employed to test the separability of the cluster labels, with all three models achieving F1 scores above 0.89 and LightGBM reaching an accuracy of about 93%. SHAP-based feature-importance analysis was used at the model level to clarify feature contributions and improve interpretability. Cluster 2 exhibits markedly higher relative seismic energy, stronger time-domain variability, and more dominant frequencies, forming a typical strong-motion hazard signature. For external engineering verification, 22 ATC-63 far-field records were mapped onto the full dataset to examine cluster-level enrichment and coverage. Cluster 2 shows significant enrichment in engineering markers and high coverage and is therefore identified as the collapse-sensitive phenotype cluster (COP). Overall, the framework provides a technical basis for ground-motion selection in collapse assessment, fragility analysis, and design evaluation.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: