Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A scoping review explores challenges and strategies in using digital technology for IPV violence among migrants, indicating a need for further research.
This scoping review explores the use of digital technology to address intimate partner or domestic violence (IPV/DV) among diverse migrant populations, including forcibly displaced individuals. Informed by a feminist intersectional and critical digital equity lens, we examine the systemic challenges empirically reported to affect migrants’ use of digital tools in responding to IPV/DV, as well as the strategies used by migrants and service providers to address these challenges. Twenty studies were analyzed. The findings show a range of digital tools used for outreach, public education, services, and platforms for community support and activism. The studies collectively illustrate how barriers, such as digital IPV/DV, financial insecurity, fear due to precarious immigration status, linguistic marginalization, and limited digital literacy, intersectionally compromise migrants’ access to or use of digital tools to address IPV/DV. While a few studies reported on individual strategies for migrants to navigate digital IPV/DV and digital safety concerns, and for service providers to ensure privacy, there remains a notable lack of research addressing intersecting challenges faced by diverse migrant survivors. Future research that intentionally addresses intersecting systemic factors impacting the use of digital tools for IPV/DV among diverse groups of migrant survivors is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: