Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The predictive power of a data collection over a target has no rigorous multi-scale measure. We introduce the predictability coastline C(ε), which traces how predictive capacity scales with data resolution via an information-theoretic filtration. The coherent coastline — a min-envelope over diverse prediction targets — strips measurement artifacts to isolate system-intrinsic information. Across six systems (Lorenz, Hénon, SPY, TLT, GLD, thermostat), the coherent coastline produces a three-tier separation: chaotic attractors (0.28–0.40), financial markets (0.04–0.14), and structureless noise (≈0.03). We formalize the capture threshold — the resolution at which an observer's model exceeds the target's self-model — and show it arises from kernel asymmetry, not resolution depth. Bridge-targeted data removal is 7.7× more effective than uniform minimization. The framework's value lies in the coastline's shape, not in any extracted scalar.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larsen James Close (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: