PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Ecological Entomology0 citationsOpen Access

All the flight we cannot see: Using passive acoustic monitoring to track the world's largest bumble bee, Bombus dahlbomii

View Full Paper
CGCandace GalenDSDavid SusičAGAnton Gradišek

Key Points

  • The aim is to utilize passive acoustic monitoring to assess and track populations of Bombus dahlbomii, an endangered bumble bee species.
  • Deployed passive acoustic monitoring stations in flowering stands across Chile and Argentina.
  • Recorded flight buzzes of B. dahlbomii and invasive species.
  • Utilized a convolutional neural network model to identify buzzes in soundscapes.
  • Paired recordings with visual observations for ground-truthing.
  • Achieved an accuracy of ≥95% in identifying bumble bee buzzes using CNN and heuristic classification methods.
  • The CNN error rate increased by approximately 20% when test site data were excluded from training.
  • Anthropogenic background noise affected the correlation between CNN outputs and observer sightings.

Abstract

Abstract Bumble bees ( Bombus spp.) are declining worldwide, creating an urgent need for rapid and non‐lethal sampling of their distributions and abundances. The endangered Patagonian bumble bee, Bombus dahlbomii (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Guérin‐Meneville, 1835, threatened by invasive congeners, exemplifies this trend. We deployed passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) to survey geographically distant populations of B. dahlbomii in Chile and Argentina. PAM stations in flowering stands recorded flight buzzes of B. dahlbomii and invasive species, Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Linnaeus, 1758 and Bombus ruderatus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Fabricius, 1775. Recordings were paired with visual observations for ground‐truthing. Flight buzzes of native and invasive congeners exhibit unique harmonic structures that differ in their fundamental frequency. We used a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to identify bumble bee buzzes in soundscapes, and heuristic classification to assign these buzzes to either native B. dahlbomii or invasive congeners. Both CNN and heuristic models exhibited accuracy ≥95%. However, the error rate for the CNN algorithm increased by ~20% when data from the test site were omitted in training, as would be the case for sampling a novel location. Anthropogenic background noise reduced the correlation between CNN output and observer sightings and increased errors in recognizing B. dahlbomii buzzes. Overall, the use of PAM shows promise in identifying drivers of the decline of B. dahlbomii and particularly the role of the invasive congeners.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Galen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a957ecb39a600b3f04cfhttps://doi.org/10.1111/een.70068
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper