Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized controlled trial assesses necrosectomy strategies in necrotizing pancreatitis, revealing shorter recovery with immediate approach.
The optimal timing for direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) following endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage of symptomatic necrotizing pancreatitis remains unknown. We hypothesized that immediate DEN following EUS-guided drainage might reduce the time to disease resolution compared with a drainage-oriented step-up approach. This study was a multicenter, open-label, superiority randomized trial (WONDER-01). Among patients who received EUS-guided treatment for symptomatic necrotizing pancreatitis, eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either immediate DEN or the drainage-oriented step-up approach. The primary endpoint was the time from randomization to clinical success, defined as a decrease in collection size to ≤3 cm and an improvement in inflammatory markers. Seventy patients were enrolled in this study: 33 in the immediate DEN arm and 37 in the step-up arm. Immediate DEN was associated with a shorter time to clinical success than the step-up approach ( P = .009), with median times (95% confidence interval) of 29 (19–34) and 44 (38–52) days, respectively. All patients in the immediate DEN arm received DEN compared to 46% in the step-up approach arm, but the rates of procedure-related adverse events were comparable (24% vs 22%, respectively; P = .79). No significant differences were noted between the treatment arms in terms of technical success (100% vs 97%, P > .99) and mortality (12% vs 5.4%, P = .41). Compared with the step-up approach, immediate DEN following EUS-guided drainage of necrotizing pancreatitis reduced time to clinical success without increasing adverse outcomes but required more DEN procedures ( ClinicalTrials.gov , Number: NCT05451901).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saito et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: