Identifies B-cell epitopes for Q fever diagnosis in sheep, suggesting multi-epitope approaches enhance accuracy.
Introduction Q fever, caused by Coxiella burnetii , is a zoonotic disease of global relevance with domestic ruminants as the main reservoirs. Serological diagnosis, especially enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), often suffers from limited sensitivity and specificity due to antigenic variability and cross-reactivity. Scientific goal In this study, a combined proteomic and literature research approach was used to identify immunoreactive proteins and predict linear B-cell epitopes as alternative diagnostic targets. Methods Total protein extracts of a C. burnetii field isolate from sheep were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, and immunoreactive proteins were detected by Western blotting using pooled sheep sera obtained from various flocks with known Q fever status. Immunoreactive proteins were identified by LC–MS/MS and used for linear B-cell epitope prediction for peptide synthesis. Peptides ( n = 30) were initially screened by fluorescent ELISA against nine field serum pools (90 individual sera), and the most promising peptides ( n = 15) were individually tested with 79 single sera. Diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and by a multi-peptide rule (“positive if ≥1 peptide reactive”). Results A total of 156 seroreactive proteins, including 51 previously reported antigens, were detected, among others, Com1, CBU_0482, and Mip. Although the selected 15 peptides showed a specific reaction with pooled sera, they showed limited diagnostic performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.5–0.7 when using single serum samples ( n = 79). Multi-peptide combinations (6–8 peptides) increased sensitivity (Se) to 80% and specificity (Sp) to 75%. Discussion Although single peptides lacked discriminatory power, multi-epitope combinations reached acceptable accuracy and may be used as a complementary tool for commercial ELISAs. However, larger bioinformatic approaches and validation studies are required to identify specific peptides of high diagnostic accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kozytska et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: