Implementation of remote blood refrigerators improves blood allocation and reduces massive transfusion protocol overactivations.
Objective Electronic remote blood issue using remote blood refrigerators has been shown to deter against excessive ordering of blood products by clinicians. Here we report on our experience implementing remote blood refrigerators in surgical and trauma settings, with a focus on shifts in massive transfusion protocol overactivation tendencies. Methods We installed remote blood refrigerators in the operating room, intensive care unit, and emergency department. Clinical staff were trained in the appropriate use and integration of these refrigerators into patient care workflows. Remote blood refrigerator use in the operating room was analyzed from software-generated logs. Massive transfusion protocol activations over a 55-month period were collated from massive transfusion protocol requisition forms. Results In the first 6 months after their introduction, remote blood refrigerators performed 1714 electronic crossmatches and dispensed 173 red blood cell units to 93 surgical patients. The remaining 1541 (90%) crossmatches were not transfused, representing substantial savings in technologist work-hours. In the emergency department, the median rate of massive transfusion protocol overactivations dropped from 4 per month to 1 per month in the 15 months preceding and 40 months following remote blood refrigerator implementation (P = 9.92 ×10−5). Conclusions Increased accessibility of blood products to clinicians through remote blood refrigerators led to improved efficiency in our blood product allocation process and substantially reduced the rate of massive transfusion protocol overactivation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: