PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 20, 2026Clinical & Experimental Immunology6 citationsOpen Access

Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Biomarkers, Drivers, and Emerging Therapeutic Targets

View Full Paper
SKSangeeta KumariKPKaterina PardaliMKMaarten C. Kraan

Key Points

  • This review aims to clarify the role of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) regarding their utility as biomarkers and mechanistic drivers of the disease.
  • Summarization of clinical evidence linking NETs to RA
  • Analysis of NET components and their correlation with disease activity
  • Review of therapeutic impacts of biological DMARDs on NET levels
  • Examination of preclinical studies involving PAD4 inhibitors and citrullinated histone antibodies
  • Elevated NET components correlate with inflammatory markers in RA
  • Biological DMARD treatment reduces NET markers
  • Persistent NET formation associates with poor treatment responses
  • NETs promote inflammatory processes such as ACPA formation and osteoclastogenesis

Abstract

Abstract Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are web-like structures composed of DNA, histones, and granule proteins released by activated neutrophils. While originally characterized as part of the innate immune response, NETs are now recognized as contributors to the pathogenesis of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This review summarizes current clinical evidence linking NETs to RA, with a focus on their utility as biomarkers for disease activity and treatment response, and their potential mechanistic role in disease progression.Elevated levels of NET components such as MPO–DNA complexes, citrullinated histones, and calprotectin, have been reported in RA and correlate with inflammatory markers and clinical disease activity scores. Treatment with biological DMARDs, including TNFα and IL-6 inhibitors, reduces NET markers, whereas persistent NET formation is associated with poor response. NETs also promote pathogenic processes, including ACPA formation, Th17 activation, and osteoclastogenesis. Although no therapies currently target NET formation directly, preclinical studies using PAD4 inhibitors and antibodies against citrullinated histones show promising effects. Standardizing NET biomarkers and conducting longitudinal studies will be essential for clinical translation. Overall, NETs represent both a biomarker and a mechanistic driver in RA, offering a novel opportunity for therapeutic intervention.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kumari et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6997f9c9ad1d9b11b34527c0https://doi.org/10.1093/cei/uxag011
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper