Part II develops a theoretical framework for control surface and regime separation in autonomous agents, suggesting implications for audit and insurability.
This record contains Part II of the Execution Admissibility Theory for Autonomous Agents series.It is a formal theoretical specification intended for audit, regulatory, and insurability evaluation contexts. Title:Execution Admissibility Theory for Autonomous Agents — Part II: Control Surface and Regime Separation Author:Aslanbek Yurievich KhamikoevIndependent Researcher, AI Systems Governance and Execution Safety Position in Series Part II develops the structural control-surface framework and regime separation model introduced after the bounded-loss execution results established in Part I. Part I (bounded-loss theorem anchor) establishes formal deployability and insurability conditions under invariant-mediated execution-admissibility constraints. Part II introduces: Control-surface formalization Policy-cone relationship Execution regime separation Control-surface integrity criteria Insurability condition as regime property Audit and regulator interpretation layer Explicit non-implementation scope boundary This document is theoretical and property-level.It does not define protocol formats, cryptographic constructions, or machine state machines. Scope Classification Document role:Theory / Regime Model / Audit and Regulator Interpretation Layer Status:Non-Implementation Theoretical Specification Applicability:Effectful execution channels only Relation to Series Supplement to: Execution Admissibility Theory for Autonomous Agents — Part I:Deployable and Insurable AGI Requires Verifiable Execution Admissibility(DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18663653) Foundational basis for planned Part III:Execution Admissibility Theory for Autonomous Agents — Part III:Non-Bypass and Conformance Theory Files Included in This Record Execution_Admissibility_Theory_Part_II.pdfCanonical formatted publication version Execution_Admissibility_Theory_Part_II.texLaTeX source (Overleaf-ready) Execution_Admissibility_Theory_Part_II.txtPlain-text archival version File order reflects canonical publication hierarchy:(1) formatted publication record,(2) source document,(3) archival plain-text reference.This series forms a structured DOI-linked theoretical corpus on execution admissibility as a deployability and insurability condition for high-capability autonomous systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aslanbek Yurievich Khamikoev (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: