Compares serum neurofilament light chain measurement methods in transthyretin amyloidosis, suggesting alternatives to the gold standard.
Background/Objectives: Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is an early and sensitive biomarker of polyneuropathy. This study compared the UmanDiagnostics enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) R-PLEX assay with the current gold-standard single-molecule array (Simoa) assay for sNfL measurement. Methods: sNfL levels were measured with Simoa, ELISA, and MSD R-PLEX in 330 serum samples from 73 individuals with a pathogenic transthyretin gene variant (TTRv) and in 165 healthy controls (HC) with ELISA and MSD R-PLEX. Results: Median sNfL levels, assessed in serum samples from TTRv individuals, differed across all assays (all p < 0.001). Passing–Bablok regression slopes were 1.01 (Simoa–ELISA), 1.00 (Simoa–MSD R-PLEX), and 1.02 (MSD R-PLEX-ELISA), with very strong correlations (all r > 0.8). Bland–Altman analysis showed mean differences of 0.1 ± 0.2 pg/mL (Simoa–ELISA), 0.7 ± 0.1 pg/mL (Simoa–MSD R-PLEX), and −0.6 ± 0.2 pg/mL (MSD R-PLEX-ELISA). In HC, sNfL levels positively correlated with age. Z-score normalization allowed for inter-assay comparison. Conclusions: The ELISA and MSD R-PLEX assays provide suitable alternatives for the Simoa assay to measure sNfL levels in carriers of a pathogenic TTR-gene variant. The differences in concentrations defined by the assays directly relate to the internal standard provided with the assays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berends et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: