Evaluates measurement uncertainty in rotor inspection methods, suggesting complementary use in inspections.
Dimensional verification of turbomachinery rotors requires traceable accuracy on functional data and dense coverage of freeform blades. This study quantifies the expanded measurement uncertainty (U95) for a centrifugal rotor inspected with a bridge-type CMM (Nikon Altera 10.10.8) and a structured-light scanner (ATOS Compact Scan 5M Rev.1), using repeated measurements in accordance with ISO 10360 and ISO 15530-3. The CMM achieved U95 ≈ 4–6 µm on bores, whereas optical scanning yielded U95 ≈ 12–18 µm on freeform blade regions. Cross-system results exhibited systematic offsets, indicating that the two methods are not directly interchangeable in absolute terms. Nevertheless, they are complementary: CMM ensures datum traceability, while optical scanning enables rapid full-field blade assessment, supporting uncertainty-aware hybrid inspection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dumitrache et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: