PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 20, 2026Medical Science EducatorOpen Access

Cognitive Load in Virtual Reality Anatomy Education: Comparing 2D and 3D Learning Experiences

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

BLBrandon LowrySMSamantha McGrathCEChad Eitel

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analyses how 2D versus 3D VR modules affect cognitive load in anatomy education, indicating design importance.

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the cognitive load and learning outcomes of 2D and 3D virtual reality modules in anatomy education.
  • Assessed cognitive load using real-time biometric measurements during VR modules.
  • Compared 2D images and 3D models in teaching laryngeal anatomy.
  • Conducted pre- and post-surveys to gauge student perceptions of VR technology.
  • Participants in the 2D group reported a higher mean cognitive load than those in the 3D group.
  • No significant differences were found in learning outcomes between the two groups.
  • Students' cognitive load was independent of their attitudes and prior experience with VR.

Cite This Study

Lowry et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6997fa49ad1d9b11b34536bchttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-026-02655-1
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments2003 · 2,964 citations
  2. 2Teaching respect for body donors: A US medical student perspective2024 · 6 citations
  3. 3Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization1978 · 2,641 citations
  4. 4The long-term impact of team-based learning on medical students’ team performance scores and on their peer evaluation scores2016 · 66 citations
  5. 5Profiting from public dissection: A new era of unethical practices2023 · 17 citations