Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey evaluates online reviews' impact on surgeon selection in plastic surgery patients, suggesting significant influence.
Introduction: Online reviews have become an influential factor in shaping patient perceptions and patient-physician engagement. Prior studies have demonstrated that a single positive review on RealSelf.com was associated with a 30% increase in aesthetic surgery volume, and that review quantity more strongly affects patient perceptions and behaviors than average rating. Methods: This study aimed to evaluate the utilization and influence of online reviews among plastic surgery patients. A cross-sectional survey of 111 adult plastic surgery patients was conducted to assess the role of online reviews in surgeon selection and patient perceptions. Results: Among respondents, 8.3% identified their surgeon through online reviews, while 45% researched their surgeon prior to their visit. Overall, 77% of patients regarded online reviews as both accurate and important. A significant difference in perceived accuracy was observed between patients referred, recommended, or influenced by advertisement and those who used the internet to find their surgeon ( P = .043, n = 84). Elective and nontrauma patients were significantly more likely to research their surgeon than cancer and reconstructive patients ( P = .004, n = 97). The most valued review characteristics were a high overall rating (60%), reviews with the presence of text (23%), and a large number of reviews (17%). Conclusion: Online reviews represent an influential resource for patients considering plastic surgery. Understanding how patients utilize this resource raises surgeon awareness of patient perceptions and this relatively new phenomenon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: