PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 20, 2026Energies1 citationsOpen Access

Design and Economic Evaluation of the Increase to 95% CO2 Removal in Power Generation and Gas Discharge of a Steel Plant

View Full Paper
OFOmnia W. F. M. FaragSMStefania Moioli

Key Points

  • The study aims to optimize CO2 capture efficiency using monoethanolamine in steelmaking processes.
  • Evaluated an MEA-based CO2 capture system aiming for 95% capture efficiency.
  • Investigated parameters like absorber height, lean loading, regenerator height, pressure, and solvent temperature.
  • Conducted techno-economic assessment to integrate process improvements and evaluate costs.
  • Achieved optimal absorber height of 20 m and lean loading of 0.20 mol CO2/mol MEA.
  • Increased capture efficiency from 90% to 95% with minimal increase in thermal energy demands.
  • Established a business plan assessing the economic implications of a carbon tax.

Abstract

Greenhouse gas emissions represent one of the most significant environmental challenges of the 21st century, with CO2 the major contributor, particularly in the steelmaking sector. To mitigate these emissions, carbon-capture, utilization, and storage technologies (CCUS) are considered the most mature technology, as they capture the CO2 from the blast furnace gas stream and utilize it in chemical production. Since monoethanolamine (MEA) remains the benchmark solvent used in post-combustion capture, this study focused on the process optimization and techno-economic evaluation of an MEA-based CO2 capture system to achieve 95% CO2 capture efficiency, which has still not been considered in detail in the literature. The optimization aims to achieve higher capture efficiency while minimizing the regeneration energy demand by investigating key parameters, including the absorber height, lean loading, regenerator height, regenerator pressure, and lean solvent inlet temperature. The results indicate that the absorber packed height and lean loading are the most influential parameters in increasing the capture efficiency from 90% to 95%, with optimal values of 20 m and 0.20 mol CO2/mol MEA, with an optimum value of 15 m for the regenerator height. Despite the capture target higher than 90%, the thermal energy requirement increased only marginally, from approximately 3.75 of the 90% CO2 removal system to 3.80 GJ/tCO2. A techno-economic assessment was then integrated to translate the process improvements into economic terms, considering the calculations of CAPEX and OPEX of the process, and a business plan was created to assess the effect and the application of the carbon tax on inflation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Farag et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6997fa5aad1d9b11b34538d8https://doi.org/10.3390/en19041053
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Optimized Chemical Absorption Process for CO2 Removal in a Steel Plant2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2Techno-economic study of different process configurations of CO2 capture by MEA absorption and utilization of an MCDM method for their ranking2024 · 29 citations
  3. 3Industrial Post-Combustion Carbon Capture: Strategies for Emission Control in Power Plants and Manufacturing Sectors2026
  4. 4Synergistic CO2 Capture and Utilization Using Monoethanolamine Recirculation and Mineral Carbonation with CaO/MgO2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Techno-Economic Evaluation of CO2 Capture in Biomass Boilers: A Comparison between MEA and DEA2026