Case report illustrates effects of ablative and non-ablative laser treatments on skin recovery, suggesting effective options for restoration.
Background/Objective The aims of this case report study was to investigate the effect of both ablative and non-ablative laser sources in the restoration of the epidermal profile with split-face confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) evaluation. Methods A patient was treated with a standard laser treatment that use simultaneously both ablative and non-ablative sources in split face mode; one side with CO2 alone and the other with the combined use of CO2 and a 1540 nm emission. LC-OCT imaging was carried out before the procedure (T0), at 24 hours (T1), and at 7 days (T7). Results In the CO2 + 1540 nm modality, the general appearance was comparable to the CO₂-only side. At T7, the CO2-only side demonstrated substantial clinical recovery, while the combined CO2 + 1540 nm side shows faster re-epithelialization. This split-face LC-OCT evaluation highlights that both treatment modalities induce comparable early inflammatory changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: