Milgram’s obedience experiments (1961–1963) are typically interpreted as evidence of human susceptibility to authority, but such readings remain confined to the psychological scale, treating obedience and disobedience as individual dispositions. This paper reframes Milgram’s findings through the structural lens of Architectural Epistemics—using the Epistemic Polarity Framework (EPF), Forced‑Position Framing (FPF), and Supra‑Agency Theory (SAT)—to show that the experiment is not merely a study of obedience but a controlled demonstration of epistemic polarity, agency collapse, and system‑level containment. Within this framework, the obedient majority exemplify Ruled Agency (RA), the agentic expression of Opacity Epistemics (OE), marked by narrative compliance, externalized responsibility, and acceptance of an imposed interpretive frame, while the disobedient minority exemplify Personal Agency (PA), the expression of Transparency Epistemics (TE), characterized by autonomy, moral self‑reference, and resistance to narrative constraint. Milgram’s “agentic state” thus becomes a system‑induced transition from TE‑aligned PA to OE‑aligned RA. By shifting the analysis from psychology to architecture, this paper shows that obedience and disobedience are structural outcomes of epistemic design, revealing how authority pressure can reorganize agency, centralize interpretive authority, and polarize epistemic posture.
Eric Warman (Wed,) studied this question.