Citizen science reveals predation patterns in Cooper’s Hawk and Sharp-shinned Hawk, suggesting they are mainly bird specialists.
Although Astur cooperii (Cooper’s Hawk) and Accipiter striatus (Sharp-shinned Hawk) are common and widespread, their diets have been poorly studied. Although some dietary datasets indicate both prey heavily on birds, most studies have focused on nest site or bird feeder observations, thus precluding comprehensive assessments of the species’ diets. Recently, increased popularity in citizen science programs like iNaturalist and eBird have allowed an unprecedented glimpse into the ecology of both species that may allow dietary analyses. Herein, we used iNaturalist, a photograph-vouchered citizen science platform, to perform an assessment of Astur cooperii and Accipiter striatus diets, examining patterns of prey size and species preferences for each predator. Given that both species are known to prey heavily and, in some cases, primarily on birds, we hypothesized that the prey base observed for both species on iNaturalist would be largely avian, however, we suspected some mammals might also be consumed. Across 74,974 photographs of Astur cooperii and Accipiter striatus, we found 4,206 (6.79% of records) and 619 (4.75% of records) predation events for Astur cooperii and Accipiter striatus, respectively. After accounting for spatial heterogeneity in observation data, we found Astur cooperii selected for Columbiformes, Colaptes auratus (Northern Flicker), and Passeriformes, with their most elected prey item matching their most observed prey item, Columba livia (Rock Pigeon). The smaller-bodied Accipiter striatus preferred small Passeriformes, though Columbiformes were also selected for. Both species exhibited bimodal prey size selection, likely driven by differential use of Columbiformes and other prey items. Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that Astur cooperii and Accipiter striatus are largely avian specialists, despite Astur cooperii’s regular predation on small mammals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gibson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: