Why the study?
The ischemic benefit of DAPT is partially offset by bleeding risk, with intracranial hemorrhage representing its most serious complication.
This review highlights the 0.2%-0.3% annual risk of intracranial hemorrhage with DAPT, emphasizing the need for careful risk-benefit assessment, especially in patients with prior stroke or TIA.
Requires careful DAPT risk-benefit assessment in prior stroke/TIA patients; leaves open optimal mitigation strategies.
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with acetylsalicylic acid and a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor is an established therapy for a broad spectrum of patients with cardiovascular disease. The ischemic benefit of DAPT is partially offset by its increased bleeding risk, with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) being the most serious complication. Although uncommon (0.2%-0.3% annually), its cumulative burden can be substantial given the number of patients afflicted by cardiovascular disease worldwide. Patients with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack harbor a particularly high risk for ICH when treated with DAPT. Prediction rules may assist clinicians when weighing the risk/benefit ratio of prescribing DAPT for patients with stroke/transient ischemic attack in the nonacute, ambulatory setting. Currently, there are no reversal agents that can rapidly and effectively reverse the effect of P2Y₁₂ inhibitors in routine practice, although a reversal agent for ticagrelor is under clinical investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ha et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: