Experiments show domesticated wheat exhibits stronger competitiveness, while modern breeding reduces this trait, implying effects on crop production.
• Domesticated wheat plants are stronger competitors than their wild relatives • Stronger competitive ability evolved early during the domestication process • Competitiveness increased through larger, steeper leaves and apical dominance • Modern wheat breeding has weakened competitiveness for high-density planting Domesticated wheat plants are stronger competitors than their wild relatives Stronger competitive ability evolved early during the domestication process Competitiveness increased through larger, steeper leaves and apical dominance Modern wheat breeding has weakened competitiveness for high-density planting Crop domestication involved adaptation of wild plants to human exploitation, 1 1. Harlan, J.R. ∙ de Wet, J.M.J. ∙ Price, E.G. Comparative evolution of cereals Evolution. 1973; 27 :311-325 Google Scholar , 2 2. Purugganan, M.D. ∙ Fuller, D.Q. The nature of selection during plant domestication Nature. 2009; 457 :843-848 Google Scholar , 3 3. Purugganan, M.D. What is domestication? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2022; 37 :663-671 Google Scholar , 4 4. Spengler, III, R.N. Nature’s Greatest Success. How Plants Evolved to Exploit Humanity University of California Press, 2025 Google Scholar but the underlying selection mechanisms remain unclear. 2 2. Purugganan, M.D. ∙ Fuller, D.Q. The nature of selection during plant domestication Nature. 2009; 457 :843-848 Google Scholar , 4 4. Spengler, III, R.N. Nature’s Greatest Success. How Plants Evolved to Exploit Humanity University of California Press, 2025 Google Scholar Archaeological evidence from the best-studied regions shows domestication occurring across a diffuse region and protracted period of at least 1,000–2,000 years, 2 2. Purugganan, M.D. ∙ Fuller, D.Q. The nature of selection during plant domestication Nature. 2009; 457 :843-848 Google Scholar , 5 5. Fuller, D.Q. Contrasting patterns in crop domestication and domestication rates: recent archaeobotanical insights from the Old World Ann. Bot. 2007; 100 :903-924 Google Scholar , 6 6. Fuller, D.Q. ∙ Denham, T. ∙ Allaby, R. Plant domestication and agricultural ecologies Curr. Biol. 2023; 33 :R636-R649 Google Scholar , 7 7. Brown, T.A. ∙ Jones, M.K. ∙ Powell, W. ... The complex origins of domesticated crops in the Fertile Crescent Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009; 24 :103-109 Google Scholar consistent with a co-evolutionary process. 2 2. Purugganan, M.D. ∙ Fuller, D.Q. The nature of selection during plant domestication Nature. 2009; 457 :843-848 Google Scholar , 3 3. Purugganan, M.D. What is domestication? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2022; 37 :663-671 Google Scholar For seed enlargement, both theory 2 2. Purugganan, M.D. ∙ Fuller, D.Q. The nature of selection during plant domestication Nature. 2009; 457 :843-848 Google Scholar , 6 6. Fuller, D.Q. ∙ Denham, T. ∙ Allaby, R. Plant domestication and agricultural ecologies Curr. Biol. 2023; 33 :R636-R649 Google Scholar , 8 8. Fuller, D.Q. ∙ Allaby, R.G. ∙ Stevens, C. Domestication as innovation: the entanglement of techniques, technology and chance in the domestication of cereal crops World Archaeol. 2010; 42 :13-28 Google Scholar , 9 9. Fuller, D.Q. ∙ Denham, T. ∙ Arroyo-Kalin, M. ... Convergent evolution and parallelism in plant domestication revealed by an expanding archaeological record Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014; 111 :6147-6152 Google Scholar , 10 10. Allaby, R. Integrating the processes in the evolutionary system of domestication J. Exp. Bot. 2010; 61 :935-944 Google Scholar and empirical evidence 11 11. Milla, R. ∙ Westgeest, A.J. ∙ Maestre-Villanueva, J. ... Evolutionary pathways to lower biomass allocation to the seed coat in crops: insights from allometric scaling New Phytol. 2024; 243 :466-476 Google Scholar , 12 12. Kluyver, T.A. ∙ Jones, G. ∙ Pujol, B. ... Unconscious selection drove seed enlargement in vegetable crops Evol. Lett. 2017; 1 :64-72 Google Scholar , 13 13. Milla, R. ∙ Matesanz, S. Growing larger with domestication: a matter of physiology, morphology or allocation? Plant Biol. (Stuttg). 2017; 19 :475-483 Google Scholar indicate an unintentional evolutionary mechanism, potentially acting via an ecological process such as competition, 14 14. Jones, G. ∙ Kluyver, T. ∙ Preece, C. ... The origins of agriculture: Intentions and consequences J. Archaeol. Sci. 2021; 125 , 105290 Google Scholar , 15 15. Allaby, R.G. ∙ Stevens, C.J. ∙ Fuller, D.Q. A novel cost framework reveals evidence for competitive selection in the evolution of complex traits during plant domestication J. Theor. Biol. 2022; 537 , 111004 Google Scholar , 16 16. Preece, C. ∙ Jones, G. ∙ Rees, M. ... Fertile Crescent crop progenitors gained a competitive advantage from large seedlings Ecol. Evol. 2021; 11 :3300-3312 Google Scholar but this remains unproven. Here, we used real and virtual experiments to test the hypothesis that cultivation selected for stronger competitive ability in wheats. First, we compared three independent domestication events across wheat species, showing that domesticated landraces were stronger competitors than their wild counterparts. Model simulations reproduced this finding, showing that competitiveness increased through larger, more erect leaves and greater apical dominance. A second experiment compared wild, landrace, and elite durum wheats, finding that stronger competitiveness arose early during domestication but has been reversed by modern breeding. Simulations showed that weaker competitiveness in modern varieties arose from smaller leaves and shorter internodes. Our work indicates that competition selected for domestication traits responsible for wheat canopy growth and architecture, resulting in competitive landrace phenotypes unsuitable for conventional modern agriculture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: