Interdisciplinary analysis of G256E mutation reveals its impact on myosin's relaxation and ADP handling.
Genetic mutations in many sarcomeric proteins are linked with familial forms of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes have emerged as a powerful system to study the effects of HCM-linked mutations on impaired cardiac performance. Additionally, high-resolution structural models of actin and myosin have resolved major structural changes related to the force-generating steps of the chemo-mechanical cycle. These experimental systems can be used synergistically to model the structure-function origins of cardiac disease resulting from pathogenic sarcomere protein variants. Using an interdisciplinary approach, we analyzed the chemo-mechanical behavior of the myosin variant G256E at multiple scales. At the atomic and molecular scale, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations revealed that G256E induces structural changes in the nucleotide-binding pocket, indicative of an increased affinity of myosin for ADP, which was further validated through stopped-flow biochemistry. Steered MD simulations suggested alterations in the timing and sequence of contact pair disruptions and an increase in the work required to displace ADP·Mg 2+ from the binding pocket. In myofibrils, delayed ADP release manifested as a prolongation and reduced ADP sensitivity of the early phase of relaxation, believed to represent the rate of cross-bridge detachment. These findings highlight the importance of ADP release in the chemo-mechanical cycle and identify the molecular mechanisms by which an HCM-linked mutation leads to disease phenotypes by modifying ADP release. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that small-scale changes in the structure of myosin’s active site can lead to kinetic changes in actomyosin cycling that manifest as elevated force generation and impaired relaxation through large-scale changes in cross-bridge cycling. Overall, our study highlights how contemporary methods can explain not only the phenotypic consequences of HCM mutations but also the underlying structural and biophysical origins of disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: