PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Diabetes Epidemiology and Management0 citationsOpen Access

Association Between Therapeutic Inertia and Future Hypoglycemia Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

View Full Paper
HCHelen ChenLCLap Pui ChungYCYutong Chen

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how therapeutic inertia influences the risk of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.
  • Analyzed electronic health records from two healthcare systems (2017–2023)
  • Included adults with type 2 diabetes and above-target HbA1c levels
  • Calculated therapeutic inertia as a percentage of above-target HbA1c without therapy changes
  • Employed logistic regression models to assess hypoglycemia risks related to therapeutic inertia
  • Investigated interactions based on continuous glucose monitoring usage.
  • High therapeutic inertia (>50%) was linked to a 31% increase in odds of hypoglycemia visits (OR=1.74)
  • Insulin users had threefold higher odds of hypoglycemia visits (OR=2.95)
  • Medicare beneficiaries showed 31% higher odds of hypoglycemia compared to Medicaid beneficiaries
  • Younger adults (ages 18-44) faced higher hypoglycemia visits relative to older age groups
  • Low usage of continuous glucose monitoring (7%) affected the clarity of interaction analyses.

Abstract

Therapeutic inertia (TI), the failure to adjust therapy when HbA1c remains above- target, is a barrier to optimal glycemic control in type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study examined the association between TI and subsequent-year hypoglycemia visit, and whether continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) modifies this relationship. We analyzed electronic health records (2017–2023) from two Midwest US healthcare systems, including adults with T2D, at least one above-target HbA1c (>7% for ages 18–64; >8% for ages ≥65), and glucose-lowering prescriptions. TI was calculated annually as the percentage of above-target HbA1c results without prescription changes within 30 days. We fitted logistic regression models to examine whether high TI (>50%) was associated with subsequent-year hypoglycemia visits. An interaction term tested whether this association differed between those who used vs. did not use CGM. Among 65,983 participants (mean age 56, 51% male, 75% White), mean HbA1c at last follow-up was 8.1% (ages 18–64) and 8.0% (ages ≥ 65). High TI was associated with 31% increased odds of hypoglycemia visit (OR=1.74; 95% CI: 1.61–1.88; p <0.001). Insulin users had threefold higher odds (OR=2.95; p <0.001). Medicare beneficiaries had 31% higher odds than Medicaid beneficiaries. Adults aged 18–44 years had more hypoglycemia visits compared to other age groups. Low CGM use (7%) limited the interpretation of interaction effects (95% CI: 0.47–1.1, p =0.12). In this cohort, high TI predicted hypoglycemia-visit. Further research is needed to understand TI drivers and how to balance improving glycemic control without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994a7f873532290d01ee3chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.deman.2026.100305
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper