PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Computers in Human Behavior Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Staying healthy despite social pressure to be available? An experimental application of the Integrative Model of Mobile Media Use and Need Experiences (IM3UNE)

View Full Paper
SLS LutzCWCarina WeinmannAHAnnabell Halfmann

Key Points

  • Investigate the impact of social pressure on well-/ill-being through specific experiential mechanisms.
  • Conducted four pre-registered vignette experiments with convenience samples.
  • Sample sizes: 265, 297, 193, and 162 participants in each experiment.
  • Examined mediation via need experiences of autonomy and competence.
  • Analyzed moderation effects of salutogenic traits on the relationship between social pressure and well-being.
  • Social pressure to be available led to varied need experiences.
  • Need experiences affected users' affect, vitality, and stress levels.
  • Autonomy and competence mediated the effects, while relatedness did not.
  • Moderation effects of salutogenic traits were not significantly supported.
  • Overall, social pressure negatively impacted well-being.

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate how social pressure to be available—a situational demand arising during messenger use—affects users’ well-/ill-being. Referring to the Integrative Model of Mobile Media Use and Need Experiences , it focuses on specific mechanisms underlying this relationship: First, the mediating role of need experiences (i.e., satisfying versus frustrating users’ autonomy, competence, and relatedness) in linking social pressure to well-/ill-being; second, the moderating role of salutogenic traits (i.e., mindfulness, self-control, meaning in life, and sense of coherence) on the interplay between social pressure and need experiences, and between need experiences and well-/ill-being. These mechanisms were tested in a series of four pre-registered vignette experiments ( N 1 = 265, N 2 = 297, N 3 = 193, N 4 = 162; convenience samples). Across all experiments, the model’s mediation paths became particularly evident for autonomy and competence, but not for relatedness. However, the expected moderation effects of the respective traits were hardly supported. • social pressure to be available led to different need experiences • need experiences in turn influenced users’ affect, vitality, and stress • need for autonomy and competence (but not relatedness) served as mediating mechanisms • expected moderation effects of salutogenic traits were hardly evident • overall, effects of availability pressure on well-being were mainly detrimental

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lutz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994a7f873532290d01eef1https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2026.100977
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Navigating Social Pressure to Be Available: The Roles of Mindfulness and Need Experiences in Messenger Users’ Well-/Ill-Being2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2How and when do mobile media demands impact well-being? Explicating the Integrative Model of Mobile Media Use and Need Experiences (IM 3 UNE)2021 · 61 citations
  3. 3On Energy, Personality, and Health: Subjective Vitality as a Dynamic Reflection of Well‐Being1997 · 2,764 citations
  4. 4Lost in a Maze? On the Philosophical Problems With Differential and Individual-Level Susceptibility in Research on Media Effects2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Permanently online – Permanently connected: Explorations into university students’ use of social media and mobile smart devices2016 · 333 citations