Experimental investigation of mechanical properties in TPMS cellular structures, suggesting effective applications for lightweight materials.
This work investigates the design, manufacturing, and mechanical behavior of metallic lattice structures produced via the Lost-PLA replication technique. A parametric unit cell inspired by Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS) was defined, and two configurations were generated by varying a geometric parameter (b = 1.2 vs b = 0.8), resulting in different porosities (82% and 68%). The specimens were fabricated in AA6082 Al alloy using investment casting with sacrificial PLA models produced by FFF 3D printing. Dimensional characterization showed good agreement between CAD-estimated and experimental weights, confirming the accuracy and repeatability of the process. Static compression tests were performed on cylindrical specimens (60 mm × 46.5 mm) at 2 mm/min crosshead speed. The stress–strain curves revealed the characteristic response of cellular solids: an initial elastic regime, followed by a collapse plateau and final densification. Significant differences emerged between the two structures: the higher porosity configuration (Structure 1) displayed a stable plateau and absorbed on average 3.9 J/cm³ up to 60% strain, while the denser configuration (Structure 2) absorbed 30.9 J/cm³. These results highlight the strong influence of unit cell geometry on energy absorption capacity. The findings are consistent with the Gibson–Ashby model and with literature data on TPMS-based lattices fabricated by additive manufacturing, confirming that Lost-PLA is a suitable and cost-effective alternative for producing advanced cellular materials. The study demonstrates the potential of parameter-driven design to tailor mechanical performance, suggesting applications in lightweight protective components, crash absorbers and energy dissipating systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ceci et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: