Research investigates structural characteristics of 20th-century school buildings, revealing seismic vulnerabilities and implications for resilience.
This research investigates the structural-typological characteristics of reinforced concrete (RC) school buildings constructed between 1950 and 1980 in Italy aimed at supporting large-scale seismic vulnerability assessment. Drawing from detailed surveys of 30 schools and archival research, the work identifies four representative expert-judgment based structural archetypes, capturing recurrent features mainly based on typical in-plan characteristics of the buildings and accounting for other parameters such as number of storeys, plan geometry, frame system regularity, and infill layout. The analysis reveals common vulnerabilities, including soft-storey mechanisms, torsional irregularities, short columns, and inadequate reinforcement detailing, all of which critically affect seismic performance. Despite some favourable traits, such as rigid diaphragms and low-rise mass, the structural response is often dominated by irregularities and brittle failure modes. The classification aligns with national seismic risk mitigation frameworks (e.g., School-MARS) and provides the basis for the development of typology-based fragility models. These results may support targeted retrofit prioritization and contribute to a more refined archetype-driven approach to school vulnerability assessment, promoting scalable strategies for seismic resilience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Postiglione et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: