PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Energy Conversion and Management3 citationsOpen Access

Extended momentum model for assessing strut aerodynamic losses in vertical axis wind turbines

View Full Paper
LFLaura Suarez FernandezLSLuis SantamaríaKDKatia María Argüelles Díaz

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop an efficient strut design tool for vertical axis wind turbines to improve aerodynamic efficiency.
  • Extended the double-disk multiple streamtube (DMST) framework for loss assessment
  • Analyzed three-dimensional strut designs with various airfoil profiles
  • Validated results against computational fluid dynamics simulations
  • Tested on an urban H-rotor turbine with hollow, ribbed variable section struts
  • Thin airfoils reduced maximum power coefficient loss to 2.8% compared to thick variants
  • Thick strut designs caused a 50.3% reduction in performance, primarily due to junction interference drag
  • The root 30% of struts contributed only 1% to total aerodynamic loss
  • Sensitivity to strut thickness varies with turbine scale and operating Reynolds numbers

Abstract

• An efficient strut design tool for vertical axis wind turbines is presented. • Thin airfoils reduce parasitic losses despite the longer chord requirements. • Blade-strut interference drag is the dominant loss mechanism in thick airfoils. • Strut losses are sensitive to scale effects, not to turbine solidity. Vertical axis wind turbines offer significant potential for urban and offshore energy, yet parasitic drag from supporting struts frequently compromises their aerodynamic efficiency. Existing strut design tools are limited, leaving a gap between simplified analytical models and computationally expensive fluid dynamics simulations. This study presents a rapid, reliable method for assessing these losses by extending the double-disk multiple streamtube (DMST) framework. The model analyzes three-dimensional realistic strut designs, integrating parasitic drag and blade-strut junction interference. Validated against computational fluid dynamic simulations, the approach was tested on an urban H-rotor turbine featuring hollow, ribbed, variable section struts with distinct airfoils. Quantitative analysis revealed that the root 30% of the strut contributes only 1% to total losses, and while the thin NACA0009 reduced the maximum power coefficient by a minimal 2.8%, the thick E863 strut caused a massive 50.3% reduction in performance, driven primarily by a 39.6% drop attributed solely to junction interference drag. While strut thickness is critical for small-scale efficiency, the relative impact of parasitic losses diminishes significantly as turbine scale and operating Reynolds numbers increase. Ultimately, the developed tool enables future research to address the full complexity of multidisciplinary strut design optimization.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fernandez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994ad4873532290d01f3d4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121232
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper