Compares heat treatment effects on microstructure and mechanical properties in weathering steel, suggesting optimal conditions for bridge construction.
This study compares the strengthening and toughening mechanisms of the experimental steel in the as-rolled, tempered, and quenched and tempered (Q&T) conditions. It also explores, from a microscopic viewpoint, how heat treatment processes influence the structural evolution of Cu-rich phases under these conditions. The findings indicate that the as-rolled experimental steel exhibits a yield strength exceeding 500 MPa. However, the presence of coarse M/A islands in its microstructure causes stress concentration, which leads to a low impact energy of only 95 J at -40 °C. Upon tempering at 500 °C for 1 h, the specimens not only exhibit a yield strength of 565 MPa, a yield ratio of 0.85, and an impact energy of 184 J at -40 °C, but also achieve an excellent combination of toughness and strength. The microstructure of the Q&T experimental steel is predominantly composed of tempered sorbite. As the tempering temperature increases from 500 °C to 550 °C, the lath-like characteristics gradually disappear. Meanwhile, both the strength and low-temperature toughness are remarkably improved. Specifically, the yield strength exceeds 860 MPa, and the impact energy at -40 °C is greater than 245 J. However, it exhibits a high yield ratio ( YR ), reaching 0.97. In the as-rolled condition, the tempered state at 500 °C, and the Q&T state after tempering at 550 °C, the lattice structures of the Cu-rich phases are body-centered cubic (BCC) clusters, B2 ordered structures, and 9R ordered structures, respectively. This structural evolution occurs because as the tempering temperature rises, the Cu-rich phase structure progressively evolves towards a more stable state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: