Systematic review identifies key risks and prevention strategies for communicable diseases in migrant populations, implying urgent need for tailored health interventions.
To identify key risk factors, disease patterns, and prevention interventions for communicable diseases among migrant populations. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched multiple databases for studies published 1990-2024. Random effects models estimated pooled odds ratios from 30 studies with quantitative data. Among 14,250 participants, migration status doubled communicable disease odds (OR=2.161, 95% CI 1.780–2.622, p<0.001; I 2 =58.7%). Regional variation was significant for the Gulf Cooperation Council (OR=2.89, 95% CI 2.34–3.57) and Sub-Saharan Africa (OR=1.87, 95% CI 1.45–2.41), but not for Europe (OR=1.34, 95% CI 0.98–1.83). Forced migration showed highest risk (OR=2.87, 95% CI 2.23–3.69) versus economic migration (OR=1.89, 95% CI 1.54–2.32). Migration constitutes a fundamental social determinant of communicable disease risk. Downstream interventions (treatment 86.8%, surveillance 78.1%) vastly outnumber upstream approaches (community-based 2.6%, policy 0.9%), representing a critical implementation gap. Context-specific, migration-aware health systems addressing structural determinants are urgently needed. • Systematic review of 89 studies reveals migrant workers face doubled disease risk • Occupational exposure (83%) and endemic migration (75%) are primary risk factors • Strong correlation between geographic origin and occupational hazards (r=0.72) • Downstream interventions dominate (86%) while upstream approaches neglected (3%) • Gulf region shows highest vulnerability requiring targeted policy interventions
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brik et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: