Statistical analysis reveals shifts in THC levels of drivers, indicating potential flaws in new legal thresholds.
Our data indicate a modest upward shift in THC concentrations, continuing beyond April 2024, alongside a demographic shift toward older drivers. The nearly identical THC medians between drivers with and without conspicuous driving performance challenge the validity of the new threshold. Notably, almost half of the unimpaired drivers exceeded 3.5 ng/mL, whereas half of the impaired drivers remained below it. 7.4% of the frequent users benefited from the raised threshold, while at the same time 58.3% of occasional users-whose driving ability at THC concentrations between 1 and <3.5 ng/mL may be compromised-fell out of legal sanction. While substantial doubt remains if the initial goal was achieved, the question of an appropriate THC threshold remains unresolved and calls for alternative legal approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wohlfarth et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: