PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026CureusOpen Access

Evaluation of the Bishop Score in Comparison With Ultrasonographic Markers in Predicting Successful Induction of Labor

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AMAntonios MichailEDEkaterini DomaliGDGeorge Daskalakis

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Prospective cohort study compares Bishop score with ultrasound markers for predicting vaginal delivery, suggesting improved accuracy with new methods.

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare the predictive performance of the Bishop score and a novel ultrasound-based induction score for vaginal delivery.
  • Conducted a prospective observational cohort study with 200 women at ≥34 weeks of gestation undergoing induction of labor.
  • Participants had digital cervical exams for Bishop score calculation and undergone standardized ultrasound assessments.
  • The novel induction score incorporated cervical length, fetal head characteristics, cervical elastography, and cervical angulation.
  • Vaginal delivery occurred in the majority of cases among participants.
  • The Bishop score showed good predictive ability for vaginal delivery (AUC 0.784).
  • The novel induction score displayed significantly higher performance (AUC 0.891).
  • The new score provided a better balance of sensitivity and specificity than the Bishop score.

Cite This Study

Michail et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994b64873532290d01f87ehttps://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.103831
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share