This clinical study explores surgical interventions improving cognitive function in severe Alzheimer’s disease, suggesting potential benefits for future treatments.
By 2050, over 200 million people worldwide will have dementia, with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) accounting for 75%. Severe AD is associated with profound cognitive decline, neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in 80% of patients, and a high caregiver burden. Current pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments offer limited efficacy, especially in advanced stages. In line with the TITAN Guideline 2025[1], our study ensures transparent reporting of artificial intelligence usage and declarations. We explored surgical neuromodulation as a novel approach for severe AD, informed by advances in the brain glymphatic system[2]. From 2015 to 2025, we conducted a clinical study at two centers in Beijing, recruiting 44 patients with severe AD (MMSE 0–10, CDR3)[3]. Of these, 24 underwent surgical treatment: 14 received bilateral fornix deep brain stimulation (DBS)[4], 6 bilateral nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) DBS[5], and 4 underwent lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA). All procedures were ethically approved, with informed consent obtained through a three-dimensional decision-making model (advance directive + family + ethics committee). Preliminary results showed that both DBS and LVA were safe, with no major adverse events. One month post-surgery, DBS improved cognition, NPS (especially NBM-DBS on NPI scores), and quality of life. LVA also showed early cognitive improvement, though long-term data and larger trials are needed[6–9]. Our decade-long experience suggests that surgical interventions may offer a promising therapeutic avenue for severe AD, complementing existing strategies. These approaches may act through neural circuit modulation (DBS) and glymphatic pathway enhancement (LVA). We advocate for a multicenter alliance for AD surgery (CAST-AD) to refine indications using biomarkers such as APOEε4 and Aβ-PET.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: