Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals how structural variations in macrocycle-embedded Ru(bda) catalysts influence water oxidation rates, suggesting new design pathways.
Integration of Ru(bda) [bda = (2,2'-bipyridine)-6,6'-dicarboxylate] water oxidation catalysts together with dibenzofuran, dibenzothiophene, or carbazole heterocycles within macrocycles 1-3 affords structures with different conformational preferences. The latter are dictated by noncovalent interactions of the bda oxygens with NH (hydrogen bond) or S (chalcogen bond). The different orientations afford changes in the secondary coordination sphere, thereby influencing the rate and mechanism of photocatalytic water oxidation for the three mononuclear Ru(bda)-based catalysts, with the dibenzothiophene- and carbazole-based ones favoring the unimolecular pathway (first-order kinetics), typically related to water nucleophilic attack (WNA), and the dibenzofuran one operating via a bimolecular pathway (second-order kinetics), typically related to the interaction of two metal-oxo species (I2M). NMR and single crystal X-ray analyses provided insight into the conformational preferences of the precursor macrocycles in the Ru(II) state. Photocatalytic studies including the H/D kinetic isotope effect (KIE) in deuterated water together with theoretical studies on the orientation angle-dependent energy profile for macrocycles in the Ru(V) state afforded a structure-property relationship that explains the outcome of the water oxidation experiments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Das et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: